ICD-10 Dual Coding Proposed in Code-Flex Act

//ICD-10 Dual Coding Proposed in Code-Flex Act

ICD-10 Dual Coding Proposed in Code-Flex Act

ICD-1o and ICD-9 dual coding has been proposed in H.R. 3018 so called the Coding Flexibility in Healthcare Act of 2015 (Code-Flex) which aims to provide for a safe harbor period for the transition from  ICD–9 to ICD–10 by allowing dual coding for six months after the ICD-10 transition deadline. The bill was introduced by Representatives Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) and Tom E. Price (R-NC).

Code-FLEX defines the duration of the safe harbor period as follows:

“The transition period under subsection (a) shall begin on the first day in which the Secretary adopts such ICD–10 code sets as the standard for codes sets under section 1173(c) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320d–2(c)) and end 180 days after such date.”

Code-FLEX, if enacted, requires HHS to report to Congress 90 days after implementation of ICD-10 on the impacts the new codes are having on providers, patients and other stakeholders.

The bill has support from the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) but we wonder how health plans who have prepared to retire ICD-9 centric systems and processes will respond.  Many including Medicare’s CMS adjudication systems are not designed to support ICD-9 after October 1, 2015.



(Visited 34 times, 1 visits today)
By | 2017-05-04T04:06:21+00:00 July 10th, 2015|ICD-10|0 Comments

About the Author:

Michael is Managing Partner & CEO of No World Borders, a leading health care management and IT consulting firm. He leads a team that provides Cybersecurity best practices for healthcare clients, ICD-10 Consulting, Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records. He advises legal teams as an expert witness in HIPAA Privacy and Security, medical coding and billing and usual and customary cost of care, the Affordable Care Act and benefits enrollment, white collar crime, False Claims Act, Anti-Kickback, Stark Law, Insurance Fraud, payor-provider disputes, and consults to venture capital and private equity firms on mHealth, Cloud Computing in Healthcare, and Software as a Service. He advises self-insured employers on cost of care and regulations. Arrigo was recently retained by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) regarding a significant false claims act investigation. He has provided opinions on over $1 billion in health care claims and due diligence on over $4 billion in healthcare mergers and acquisitions. Education: UC Irvine – Economics and Computer Science, University of Southern California – Business, Stanford Medical School – Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Law School – Bioethics.

Loading Facebook Comments ...

Leave A Comment