Rand Study Details Costs and Benefits of switching from ICD-9 to ICD-10 Medical Coding

/, disease management, ICD-10, ICD-10-CM, medical claims fraud, medical payors, medical providers, RAND Corporation/Rand Study Details Costs and Benefits of switching from ICD-9 to ICD-10 Medical Coding

Rand Study Details Costs and Benefits of switching from ICD-9 to ICD-10 Medical Coding

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) provides incentives to modernize health care, including the upgrade to a new medical coding standard, ICD-10. Despite both incentives and mandates, health insurance companies, hospitals, and others want more data on the cost and benefits of the change over. We felt this data provided a good independent view of these issues.

The RAND Corporation was asked to provide research to answer these questions:

  • What are the costs and benefits of switching from ICD-9’s diagnostic codes to those of ICD-10-CM?
  • What are the costs and benefits of switching from ICD-9’s procedure codes to those of ICD-10-PCS?

The research was conducted by the Science and Technology Policy Institute (operated by RAND from 1992 to November 2003) for the Department of Health and Human Services, under contract ENG-9812731.

Summary

Statistical models led to these conclusions

Cost (March 2004 dollars)

Our best guess is that the cost of conversion will run $425 million to $1.2 Billion in one-time costs plus somewhere between $5 million and $40 million a year in lost productivity.

Benefits

  • More-accurate payments for new procedures – between $100 million and $1.2 Billion
  • Fewer miscoded, rejected claims – between $200 million and $2.5 Billion
  • Reduced “improper” or exaggerated claims (including fraud ) – between $100–$1 Billion
  • Better understanding of the value of new procedures – between $100 million to $ Billion.
  • Improved disease management –between $200 and $1.5 Billion

Conclusion

It is likely that switching to both ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS has the potential to generate
more benefits than costs.

Methodology

RAND estimated the cost of systems reprogramming by sampling payers, providers, and software vendors; dividing their answers by membership (in the case of payers) or revenue (in the case of providers and software vendors); and extrapolating to the entire population.

Their anecdotal comment was that Most observers believe that ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS are technically superior to their ICD-9-CM counterparts. If nothing else, they represent the state of knowledge of the 1990s rather than of the 1970s. They have also been deemed more logically organized, and they are unquestionably more detailed—by a factor of two in diagnoses (and twenty for injuries) and by a factor of fifty in procedures.

Related Posts
(Visited 22 times, 1 visits today)
Share

About the Author:

Michael is Managing Partner & CEO of No World Borders, a leading health care management and IT consulting firm. He leads a team that provides Cybersecurity best practices for healthcare clients, ICD-10 Consulting, Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records. He advises legal teams as an expert witness in HIPAA Privacy and Security, medical coding and billing and usual and customary cost of care, the Affordable Care Act and benefits enrollment, white collar crime, False Claims Act, Anti-Kickback, Stark Law, Insurance Fraud, payor-provider disputes, and consults to venture capital and private equity firms on mHealth, Cloud Computing in Healthcare, and Software as a Service. He advises self-insured employers on cost of care and regulations. Arrigo was recently retained by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) regarding a significant false claims act investigation. He has provided opinions on over $1 billion in health care claims and due diligence on over $4 billion in healthcare mergers and acquisitions. Education: UC Irvine – Economics and Computer Science, University of Southern California – Business, Stanford Medical School – Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Law School – Bioethics.

Loading Facebook Comments ...

Leave A Comment